GOVERNANCE

Governance principles.

Eight commitments that bind every scheme, every assessment and every decision the federation publishes.

01

Separation of functions

Standard-setting, assessment, decision and appeal are held apart. No one who assesses a file decides it; every decision is taken by two officers; appeals are heard by people who took no part in the decision.

02

Independence and impartiality

Interests are declared before work begins, conflicts are recorded and managed, and an officer with a conflict is recused. Assessment is carried out against the published standard and nothing else.

03

Due process

Applicants know the criteria in advance, see the evidence held against them, are heard before an adverse decision, receive reasons in writing, and have a published appeal window after every decision.

04

Transparency

Standards are public. Decisions are published in a permanent register with certificate number, issue instant and content hash. Refusal rates are published, so a fee can never quietly buy an outcome.

05

Proportionality

Requirements scale with the size and risk of what is assessed. Pilots are labelled as pilots, and evidence demands never exceed what the published standard requires.

06

Financial integrity

Fees pay for assessment, never for outcomes; refusal forfeits no future right to apply. No single client may become financially significant to the federation, and membership dues are accounted separately from certification fees.

07

Conformity, not artistic merit

Accreditation and certification state that published requirements are met. They are not prizes, rankings or endorsements of artistic quality, and they may never be presented as such.

08

Reviewability and correction

Every decision can be revisited: suspension, revocation, correction and appeal are part of the design. The register corrects by adding history, never by erasing it, and standards are revised on a published cycle.